Yo! Yo! Yo! fellow nerds. Very cool video – rap debate between Keynes and Hayek. Just when you think you have seen everything, …..
Damn! I was hoping to visit Cuba someday and get a socialist haircut. Luckily for me I am bald. A centrally planned hair cut can only cause so much harm.
Cuba liberalises barber shops and beauty salons
Cuban state-owned barber shops face new style: Privatisation
On a more serious note, imagine how much damage a handful of “revolutionary” windbags and buffoons, who think of themselves above laws of nature and economics, can do to society. Imagine how much Cuban society needs to develop to be able to manage a modern economy. Hope the fact that Cuba economy has fallen apart, thanks to Communism, will be a good example for other societies. But that would be asking for too much.
East Germany had West Germany to help. Still they went through a lot of pain. Who will help Cuba? Cuba is a beautiful island with, probably, the warmest people. But Cuba is a tiny, irrelevant island. It gained prominence only because some idiot Americans decided to treat Castro as something special, instead of just another third world thug – who tortures his people by forcing them to listen to his 12 hour speeches. Once Castro is gone, the significance of Cuba disappears.
Though American embargo has been a convenient excuse, given the fact that the rest of the world trades with Cuba, for their failed communist economy, it has been a good cover for the windbag Castro brothers to cover up their mess. Once Castro crocks, the fun begins. There will be the usual tussle between reformers and diehards.
Few interesting points to ponder on world hypocrisy. Two Latin American thugs – A and B. Two different treatment from the so called world community. Thug A comes to power using force and tries socialism first. Thug A survives in power less than 20 years. Thug A and friends cause the death of hundreds of political opponents, students and labour leaders. He later realises that socialism does not work, switches to a market based economy. This dramatically improves the living conditions in his country. In surveys even poor people emphasis that their lives are better today. As expected, as the economy improved, fellow citizens of thug A increasingly demand more political and social freedoms. Thug A steps down when his country is one of the richest nations in the world and soon develops one of the most vibrant democracies in the world. Politicians whom thug A tortured and persecuted come to power. Interestingly, they not only pursue the same market based policies but even improve upon it.
Thug B comes to power using force and imposes communism. His country had an average economy where the citizens were not struggling. Thug B and friends are still well and alive after more than 40 years. They are still in power. Thug B nationalises everything, ruins the economy and turns it into a basket case. As expected in any nationalised economy, political freedoms disappear. Dissidents languish in prison. People desperate to escape this socialist paradise are caught, beaten, tortured and imprisoned. (see Amnesty International.) Entire society is converted into a den of informers where even grandmothers are expected to inform on their children and grandchildren, lest the revolution be harmed. Thug B exports skilled people, especially doctors, in exchange for oil and other resources. Confirming the idea that under thug B’s ideology, people belong to the state, to be exploited as the leader sees fit. He exports his armies to all corners of the world in an attempt to export his brand of economics.
Thug B is felicitated all around the world as a great revolutionary and visionary. He is given a platform everywhere he goes to indulge in windbagging, delivering crazy rants that last hours. No warrants are issued for his arrest for his crimes and violation of human rights of his society”s citizens. Thug B, like his idol Lenin, tries market based solutions to fix the mess he and his friends created. As expected situation improves. Enterprising citizens use the opportunity to create wealth by serving others. Paranoid thug B pulls the plug on fledgling entrepreneurship, lest his system be put to shame while he is alive.
Thug A is hounded by the international community. Charges are brought against him for violation of human rights. Thanks to legal technicalities and his friends who remember that thug A saved his country from falling into the hands of communists, he stays out of prison. He dies while still being hated and condemned by the so called international community.
Thug B lives on, to give glowing accounts of his life and his achievements, standing on the ruins of his society. Glowing under thunderous applause of fawning admirers who don’t have to live under the system thug B created.
Thug B violated every human right one can think of, killed and imprisoned innocent people, presides over a ruined and suppressed society. He is admired.
Thug A violated human rights, killed and imprisoned innocent people, but left behind a wealthy and a freer society. He is hated.
Thug B is Castro. (In fact he is the prominent one among the many socialist thugs that paraded on the 20th century stage). Who is thug A?
The silent tsunami from Economists on the food crisis. Good short term and long term solutions:
Some points TVR Shenoy makes in The vanishing food stock shows you how even well informed columnists think and gives you a glimpse into why the so called food crisis exists: Shenoy writes:
Questions for the Shenoys of this world:
Wait for few weeks and we will be on to the next fad. The current food crisis will fizzle out just like the last big crisis–the rising oil price crisis. The world, thanks to globalisation, liberalisation, technology, etc., has learnt to do more with less. The world could do better, if only the governments–eastern, western, rich and poor–stop distorting the markets with indirect and disingenuous subsidies, putting unnecessary barriers to trade, playing god and market by predicting and subsidising the fuels of the future, etc.
But that is not going to happen anytime soon. Governments will over react, clamp down on exports and imports. Government officials will pretend to be business people and buy high and sell low. Like in the case of wheat import from Australia. I don’t blame them since they have to react to the Shenoys of this world, columnist and the rest of the voting population. We want quick fixes from government, we want to see politicians and bureaucrats running around pretending to be solving our problems.
Some Don Quixotes in government will chase windmills of private monopolies, hoarders and exploiters (see earlier post Of men, mice and monopolies).
Traders and speculators will continue to outwit every government plans and scheme. They will buy low from the government and sell high, back to the government. I don’t blame them either since they are usually not allowed to do anything else.
So while we live in this blameless, Kafkaesque world, doing the tango and the Kabuki with various incarnation of plans-crisis-plan, the world figures out ways to move on, get around stupidity and vanishing common sense.
This is what happens when you have monopolies. One distortion of the economy soon needs another. One destructive policy needs and equally destructive and unprincipled “remedy”. According to Railway
Minister Lalu Prasad, who presides over probably the largest monopoly in the world,
What about the other monopoly called FCI. This wonderful creation of central planning loses thousands of tonnes of food every year to men and mice. It is my contention that FCI feeds more criminals and rats day in and day out than hungry people. An exaggeration no doubt, but not by much.
Who will save us from the exploitation and profiteering of anachronistic monsters like FCI?
Next time you encounter the following: use thousands of features on your computer; wade through garbage and human excrement in railway stations that looks more like refugee camps; read about farmer suicide, even though zillions have been set aside by taxpayers to aid them, via subsidies and food procurement, and that tonnes and tonnes of food disappear every year from government shops and storage, chew on the following:
Microsoft, which delivers better and better products, every year, for cheaper and cheaper prices, is relentlessly hounded and accused of being a monopoly. But railways and FCI ……….
Before you conclude otherwise, I am a big fan of Mr Lalu Prasad. He is a shrewd politician and politics, especially in a complex democracy like India, needs more Lalu Prasads. Not naive fools whose only qualifications are that they speak English well and studied in prominent Engineering colleges. Maybe even did a tour of the West and are have come back to “serve and sacrifice” for their motherland. Clueless bull!
One more contention of mine: Mr Prasad knows fully well how destructive the Railway Ministry, the monopolistic nature of railways in India and FCI are to the development of India. He knows well that his gimmick will not make any difference whatsoever. But the price is rising, inflation is up, elections are coming, etc. etc. And he is a shrewd politician. Man got to do what a shrewd man got to do!
If politicians understood the facts and were truthful,
they would rant against “greedy” socialists rather than private oil
companies.
says Richard W. Rahn in Socialist Oil Death Spiral.
Most people do not realize that about 90 percent of the
world’s liquid oil reserves are controlled by governments or
state-owned companies. Exxon Mobil, the world’s largest privately owned
oil company, owns only 1.08 percent of the world’s oil reserves, and
the five largest private global oil companies together own only about 4
percent of the world’s oil reserves.
This is news to me too. How come we hear so much about the evil private oil company and so little about the rest?
Why do professional athletes make so much more money
than, say, professional teachers? Do people really value sports more
than they value education? Teachers provide a service that is generally
accepted as contributing real value to the development of society. Some
people view sports, however, as superfluous. They think of it as
something that society could function well without. It doesn’t seem to
make sense that work deemed important by most people could be valued
far less than that which may be unnecessary or seen as frivolous to
many.This is similar to a paradox of old: Why are diamonds so expensive
and water so cheap, when water is absolutely essential to the life of
every human, and diamonds are basically luxuries that every person is
capable of living very well without? The answer is scarcity.